The chart monitoring alleged freak-off dates, places and contributors begins in August 2009, having an face involving Sean Combs, Cassie Ventura and a person who went by the title Jules. Ventura mentioned Jules various occasions in her testimony, describing him to be a trustworthy husband or wife during the sex functions.
A chart getting offered into the jury concentrates on documents involving Kristina Khorram, the Main of employees for Sean Combs. These contain text and audio messages retrieved from several cellphones, and audio data files.
Cross-inspecting Penland about texts and various facts she reviewed for the case this afternoon, the defence hoped to show that Combs's former husband or wife and alleged target Cassie Ventura didn't object to her role in his "freak off" intercourse sessions - and was even an enthusiastic participant.
Along with the 1st entry, Assistant U.S. Legal professional Emily Johnson highlighted a textual content exchange amongst Combs and Jules from around that point that appeared to show them Functioning out their schedules for a person of such “conferences.”
Combs's law firm Teny Geragos launched one textual content chat where Cassie wrote "LOL, confident, when", when requested from the rapper to fulfill him at a hotel in Oct 2013.
知乎，让每一次点击都充满意义 —— 欢迎来到知乎，发现问题背后的世界。
The federal government highlighted a number of messages from Sean Combs’s Main of team, Kristina Khorram, referring to somebody named “Guido,” whom prior witnesses have named as among Combs’s drug sellers of choice.
He rejected arguments from your defence that this disrupted the variety on the jury, as being the juror was changed by a white male;
Penland is anticipated to return to your stand Tuesday morning to overview similar data related to Combs and “Jane,” a the latest ex-girlfriend utilizing a courtroom-authorized alias.
This questioning seems to relate to the two costs of transportation to have interaction in prostitution that Combs is struggling with.
Right before that, special agent Deleassa Penland, who began testifying yesterday, will return to the witness stand. Penland did not Focus on the Combs investigation but reviewed proof in the situation.
Before the recess, Choose Arun Subramanian sided With all the protection, which sought to Restrict how Specific agent DeLeassa Penland talks concerning the summary chart. Mainly because Penland wasn’t at these meetings — which the prosecution is read more suggesting have been freak-offs — she will be able to’t make any inferences in her testimony about what the events did. She’s minimal mainly to looking at out the varied documents, that happen to be grouped by day.
"The court should not, without a doubt simply cannot, let race element into the decision of what transpires," the decide reported;
If reviewing a chart of data looks like dry testimony, it's. And it’s produced all the greater so on account of the constraints in how the prosecution can explain the chart, necessitating them to become pretty methodical and neutral while in the presentation of such documents.
The choose stated he experienced "considerations around his candour" Which it could suggest he experienced a purpose to wish to be about the panel;